<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Careful with Numeric Data Types in MySQL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://codespatter.com/2008/07/24/careful-with-numeric-data-types-in-mysql/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://codespatter.com/2008/07/24/careful-with-numeric-data-types-in-mysql/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:05:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Rosenblatt</title>
		<link>http://codespatter.com/2008/07/24/careful-with-numeric-data-types-in-mysql/comment-page-1/#comment-13323</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Rosenblatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codespatter.com/?p=57#comment-13323</guid>
		<description>Any ideas as to why they did that? It seems like an awkward syntax; where we usually input a storage size, they went with a display size value. Something like this would be more useful on a LONGTEXT field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any ideas as to why they did that? It seems like an awkward syntax; where we usually input a storage size, they went with a display size value. Something like this would be more useful on a LONGTEXT field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Rosenblatt</title>
		<link>http://codespatter.com/2008/07/24/careful-with-numeric-data-types-in-mysql/comment-page-1/#comment-11537</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Rosenblatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codespatter.com/?p=57#comment-11537</guid>
		<description>Any ideas as to why they did that? It seems like an awkward syntax; where we usually input a storage size, they went with a display size value. Something like this would be more useful on a LONGTEXT field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any ideas as to why they did that? It seems like an awkward syntax; where we usually input a storage size, they went with a display size value. Something like this would be more useful on a LONGTEXT field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
